Windows update #311
Windows update #311
Conversation
|
Whoa, these were originally removed because https://download.docker.com/win/static/stable/x86_64/ stopped having new builds, but it looks like that's changed?? @thaJeztah is that on purpose and going to stay true?? 🙏 |
Ah! You spotted them Yes, Windows builds were disabled at some point because of As to; will they stay? We have no intent to disable them again, but I must admit that I haven't tried the builds myself; working on a 20.10.7 test release right now; if those packages appear, give them a spin as well, and I'd say; go for it |
Ahh, makes sense -- we'll give it a go!
Yeah, this is a good start, although we also need to resurrect some of the bits that were removed in #262 (honestly, the template was an oversight there 😂). I'll take over from here to get this updated with the missing bits. 😅 |
See https://download.docker.com/win/static/stable/x86_64/ 🎉 Co-authored-by: Tianon Gravi <[email protected]>
Haha, what a coincidence. I’m happy that now it will be back. |
| variantAliases=( "${versionAliases[@]/%/${variant:+-$variant}}" ) | ||
| variantAliases=( "${variantAliases[@]//latest-/}" ) | ||
|
|
||
| sharedTags=() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we want shared tags between Windows & Linux too? (like python)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We didn't previously, which is why I didn't here -- I think that was a conscious choice due to the massive differences in their ability to be functional/useful on the different platforms.
Changes: - docker-library/docker@271f58a: Merge pull request docker-library/docker#311 from krystofwoldrich/windows-update - docker-library/docker@01ecb28: Add back Windows variant
Changes: - docker-library/docker@279ba9c: Update 20.10 to 20.10.7 - docker-library/docker@271f58a: Merge pull request docker-library/docker#311 from krystofwoldrich/windows-update - docker-library/docker@01ecb28: Add back Windows variant
Hi guys,
I've needed to use docker on windows image and I've noticed the one in the repo is quite a bit old now.
Changes
Do you think it is welcomed change?
I think the template would deserve the update.
And about the explicite file, I'm not sure if it won't collide with the ci here in the repo.