-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
Phase inconsistency for quoted references #3898
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
nicolasstucki
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2018
nicolasstucki
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this issue
Jan 24, 2018
liufengyun
pushed a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this issue
Jan 26, 2018
liufengyun
pushed a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this issue
Jan 27, 2018
This issue does not only happen with varargs.
Produces and fails for the same reason with
interpreted as
|
nicolasstucki
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this issue
Feb 20, 2018
nicolasstucki
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Feb 21, 2018
Fix #3898: Do not interpret bindings for inlined parameters
nicolasstucki
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this issue
Apr 3, 2020
This Inlined node not was added as part of a fix for issue scala#3898. It was an ad-hoc patch that ended up causing more issues than fixes and therfore is removed.
nicolasstucki
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this issue
Apr 3, 2020
This Inlined node not was added as part of a fix for issue scala#3898. It was an ad-hoc patch that ended up causing more issues than fixes and therfore is removed.
nicolasstucki
added a commit
to dotty-staging/dotty
that referenced
this issue
Apr 5, 2020
This Inlined node not was added as part of a fix for issue scala#3898. It was an ad-hoc patch that ended up causing more issues than fixes and therfore is removed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When inlining the following
ff
macro, the varargsargs
is lifted out into aval
which breaks phase consistency as takes it out of a quote.When inlined the code is
and interpreted as to heal some phase inconsistencies
Tis fails due to the
x
wich should be ouside theunary_~
or inside the<special-ops>.'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: