-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 323
ArcArray1 #661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Comments
In the end, it's syntactic sugar and I think we should keep them (if nothing else, for consistency with |
Should we create |
Yes, I think we should. |
@alex179ohm if you're looking for a good issue to begin with, this could be interesting |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
There are some references to
RcArray1
&RcArray2
, causing some warnings. I was planning to put in a PR to move these to ArcArray, but ArcArray1 doesn't exist.Should we create them? Or move specializations up a level?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: