Skip to content

rustc: Change ICE message to reflect that ::rt::backtrace doesn't exist #8530

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 16, 2013

Conversation

brson
Copy link
Contributor

@brson brson commented Aug 15, 2013

The new scheduler didn't preserve this behavior.

@lilyball
Copy link
Contributor

The manual still documents ::rt::backtrace (as well as other ::rt mods; are they all gone?)

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2013
The new scheduler didn't preserve this behavior.
@bors bors closed this Aug 16, 2013
@bors bors merged commit 494da5a into rust-lang:master Aug 16, 2013
flip1995 pushed a commit to flip1995/rust that referenced this pull request May 5, 2022
…ogiq

Easier readability for `needless_late_init` message

Closes rust-lang#8530

Updated the lint to use a `MultiSpan`, showing where the `let` statement was first used and where the initialisation statement was done, as in the format described, for easier readability.

Was wondering why, when pushing the span label for the initialisation statement, that sometimes the prior statement above the initialisation statement gets pulled into the output as well - any insight is appreciated!

---

changelog: [`needless_late_init`]: Now shows the `let` statement where it was first initialized
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants