Skip to content

Fix assertion failure when syntax extension name is missing. #615

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jdm
Copy link
Contributor

@jdm jdm commented Jul 2, 2011

No description provided.

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Jul 2, 2011

Good catch! Integrated.

@brson brson closed this Jul 2, 2011
marysaka pushed a commit to sunriseos/rust that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2019
pdietl pushed a commit to pdietl/rust that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2020
ZuseZ4 pushed a commit to EnzymeAD/rust that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2023
celinval added a commit to celinval/rust-dev that referenced this pull request Jun 4, 2024
…) (rust-lang#615)

When the crate contains a build script, cargo compiles the build script first without the RUSTFLAGS. Thus, we cannot use rmc-rustc directly, or it will try to compile the build script with rmc enabled. We then fail to generate the script binary.

* Add --build-target to cargo rmc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants