-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
Add urls checkup #35963
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add urls checkup #35963
Conversation
(rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
|
af01ba2
to
3f79988
Compare
Woups! Fixed. |
I need to include cargo into travis as well. Any preferred way on how I should do it? |
@GuillaumeGomez I have no idea :( I know very little about travis setup. |
@GuillaumeGomez are you sure that is the problem? Looking at the error message:
it seems like you might need to remove one |
That's not what I see: sh: 1: cargo: not found |
This is probably not too constructive of a comment, but if Travis CI started using rustbuild, I think we'd have cargo available. From what I understand, with the old |
It uses make and docker. |
cc @sanxiyn |
@frewsxcv is right. Travis is currently using make-based build and cargo is not available. |
My question was: how could I add it? Do I download it from the rust-lang website or do I look for another source? |
@GuillaumeGomez seems like we'd have to download it -- the |
Ah ok, so looking at this, I think we've got a few options of how to proceed:
My preference and recommendation would be to just switch to using rustbuild. That may, however, expose some bugs that also need to be solved. Basically the tl;dr; is that I don't believe this will be a trivial patch, but rustbuild has the most promise for being the easiest route. |
@alexcrichton: Thanks for the propositions! I'll wait for the rustbuild switch and then I'll just run it on the docs. |
Ok, I'm going to close this in #36180 which is attempting to enable rustbuild |
Fixes #35921.