-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.3k
trpl: Semantic accuracy in borrow scope rules. #26125
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
The text claimed 'any borrow must last for a _smaller_ scope than the owner', however the accurate way of describing the comparison is inclusive (i.e., 'less than or equal to' vs. 'less than').
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @alexcrichton (or someone else) soon. If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes. Please see the contribution instructions for more information. |
@bors: r+ rollup |
📌 Commit 0a70c94 has been approved by |
⌛ Testing commit 0a70c94 with merge 1a938cc... |
Thank you! |
@bors: retry force clean |
The text claimed 'any borrow must last for a _smaller_ scope than the owner', however the accurate way of describing the comparison is inclusive (i.e., 'less than or equal to' vs. 'less than').
The text claimed 'any borrow must last for a smaller scope than the
owner', however the accurate way of describing the comparison is
inclusive (i.e., 'less than or equal to' vs. 'less than').