Skip to content

trpl/macros: Fix description of assert! #25607

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2015
Merged

trpl/macros: Fix description of assert! #25607

merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2015

Conversation

peferron
Copy link
Contributor

"Truth passes, success panic!s" seems to be a typo. The closest fix would be something like "Success passes, failure panic!s" but to me a "comparison failure" suggests that we couldn't compare the two values at all, not that we could successfully compare them and that the result was non-equality. So I opted to rewrite the paragraph a bit. If there's a better alternative please let me know.

r? @steveklabnik

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @steveklabnik (or someone else) soon.

If any changes to this PR are deemed necessary, please add them as extra commits. This ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since they last reviewed the code. The way Github handles out-of-date commits, this should also make it reasonably obvious what issues have or haven't been addressed. Large or tricky changes may require several passes of review and changes.

Please see CONTRIBUTING.md for more information.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 19, 2015

📌 Commit afbe15d has been approved by steveklabnik

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

Yup, you're totally right. Thank you!

steveklabnik added a commit to steveklabnik/rust that referenced this pull request May 19, 2015
…teveklabnik

"Truth passes, success `panic!`s" seems to be a typo. The closest fix would be something like "Success passes, failure `panic!`s" but to me a "comparison failure" suggests that we couldn't compare the two values at all, not that we could successfully compare them and that the result was non-equality. So I opted to rewrite the paragraph a bit. If there's a better alternative please let me know.

r? @steveklabnik
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2015
@bors bors merged commit afbe15d into rust-lang:master May 20, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants