Skip to content

glob: Deprecate the library in favor of cargo #16685

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 27, 2014

Conversation

alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

This library has been moved out to a cargo package in rust-lang.

@steveklabnik
Copy link
Member

😍

This library has been moved out to a cargo package in rust-lang.
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 27, 2014
This library has been moved out to a cargo package in rust-lang.
@bors bors closed this Aug 27, 2014
@bors bors merged commit 118f481 into rust-lang:master Aug 27, 2014
@tshepang
Copy link
Member

Am curious, why is this being removed?

@alexcrichton alexcrichton deleted the remove-glob branch August 30, 2014 06:20
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

This package is being moved outside of the repository, not removed outright. It will be easier to develop, version, and depend on outside of the standard distribution.

https://github.com/rust-lang/glob

@tshepang
Copy link
Member

@alexcrichton is there a discussion regarding this somewhere? My quick searches fail me. I want to know, for example, whether it's not deemed important enough to be part of the stdlib, or whether some drastic changes are about to happen to it, without the (supposedly) more stringent stdlib back-compact requirements.

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member Author

There is an old mailing list thread that spurred discussion here: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2014-July/010842.html

And then there is another mailing list thread which made the process official here: https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/rust-dev/2014-July/010956.html

@tshepang
Copy link
Member

The links were more than adequate, thanks much.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants