Revert #135914: Remove usages of QueryNormalizer in the compiler

[compiler-errors]

Reverts #135914.

r? jackh726

[jackh726]

@bors r+

[bors]

📌 Commit 4e3e915 has been approved by jackh726

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[compiler-errors]

@bors rollup=never

(perf sensitive 😉)

[fmease]

Bumping priority above rollup level because it fixes a significant perf regression and because it's been sitting here "in limbo" for four days already

@bors p=6

[bors]

⌛ Testing commit 4e3e915 with merge 122fb29...

[bors]

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: jackh726
Pushing 122fb29 to master...

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (122fb29): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text below

Our benchmarks found a performance regression caused by this PR.
This might be an actual regression, but it can also be just noise.

Next Steps:

• If the regression was expected or you think it can be justified,
  please write a comment with sufficient written justification, and add
  @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged to it, to mark the regression as triaged.
• If you think that you know of a way to resolve the regression, try to create
  a new PR with a fix for the regression.
• If you do not understand the regression or you think that it is just noise,
  you can ask the @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance working group for help (members of this group
  were already notified of this PR).

@rustbot label: +perf-regression
cc @rust-lang/wg-compiler-performance

Instruction count

This is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	0.3%	[0.2%, 0.3%]	16
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-1.1%, -0.2%]	24
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-5.9%	[-10.4%, -0.9%]	10
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.4%	[-1.1%, -0.2%]	24

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -0.5%, secondary 1.4%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	1.7%	[0.7%, 3.5%]	4
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	2.4%	[1.2%, 3.4%]	4
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-1.9%	[-2.9%, -1.0%]	6
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.3%	[-2.3%, -2.3%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.5%	[-2.9%, 3.5%]	10

Cycles

Results (secondary -6.9%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-6.9%	[-10.8%, -3.6%]	8
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 768.982s -> 776.092s (0.92%)
Artifact size: 328.22 MiB -> 328.45 MiB (0.07%)

[rylev]

Marking as triaged since this is a revert.

@rustbot label +perf-regression-triaged