Skip to content

Update to LLVM 19.1.6 #134428

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024
Merged

Update to LLVM 19.1.6 #134428

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2024

Conversation

nikic
Copy link
Contributor

@nikic nikic commented Dec 17, 2024

Fixes the wasm64 build failure reported at rust-lang/llvm-project#180.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 17, 2024

r? @cuviper

rustbot has assigned @cuviper.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Dec 17, 2024

⚠️ Warning ⚠️

  • These commits modify submodules.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 17, 2024
@cuviper
Copy link
Member

cuviper commented Dec 17, 2024

@bors r+ rollup=never

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 17, 2024

📌 Commit 1d4530b has been approved by cuviper

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 17, 2024
@jieyouxu
Copy link
Member

@bors p=5 (rollup scheduling)

bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 18, 2024
Update to LLVM 19.1.6

Fixes the wasm64 build failure reported at rust-lang/llvm-project#180.
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 18, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 1d4530b with merge b79084f...

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

A job failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 18, 2024

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. and removed S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. labels Dec 18, 2024
@dianqk
Copy link
Member

dianqk commented Dec 18, 2024

@bors retry
curl: (56) Recv failure: Connection reset by peer

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 18, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 18, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 1d4530b with merge 057bdb3...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 18, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: cuviper
Pushing 057bdb3 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label Dec 18, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 057bdb3 into rust-lang:master Dec 18, 2024
7 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 18, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (057bdb3): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (primary -1.4%, secondary -3.7%)

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-1.4% [-1.4%, -1.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
-3.7% [-3.7%, -3.7%] 1
All ❌✅ (primary) -1.4% [-1.4%, -1.4%] 1

Cycles

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 771.888s -> 769.67s (-0.29%)
Artifact size: 330.28 MiB -> 330.31 MiB (0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants