Skip to content

Add missing intra-doc link #105100

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2022
Merged

Add missing intra-doc link #105100

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2022

Conversation

jhpratt
Copy link
Member

@jhpratt jhpratt commented Nov 30, 2022

Trivial change. This makes the plain text into inline code and makes it a link.

@rustbot label +A-docs

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 30, 2022

r? @m-ou-se

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Nov 30, 2022
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Nov 30, 2022

Hey! It looks like you've submitted a new PR for the library teams!

If this PR contains changes to any rust-lang/rust public library APIs then please comment with @rustbot label +T-libs-api -T-libs to tag it appropriately. If this PR contains changes to any unstable APIs please edit the PR description to add a link to the relevant API Change Proposal or create one if you haven't already. If you're unsure where your change falls no worries, just leave it as is and the reviewer will take a look and make a decision to forward on if necessary.

Examples of T-libs-api changes:

  • Stabilizing library features
  • Introducing insta-stable changes such as new implementations of existing stable traits on existing stable types
  • Introducing new or changing existing unstable library APIs (excluding permanently unstable features / features without a tracking issue)
  • Changing public documentation in ways that create new stability guarantees
  • Changing observable runtime behavior of library APIs

@rustbot rustbot added the A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools label Nov 30, 2022
@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Thank you! @bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 3, 2022

📌 Commit d777c84 has been approved by JohnTitor

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 3, 2022
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2022
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#104903 (Use ocx.normalize in report_projection_error)
 - rust-lang#105032 (improve doc of into_boxed_slice and impl From<Vec<T>> for Box<[T]>)
 - rust-lang#105100 (Add missing intra-doc link)
 - rust-lang#105181 (Don't add a note for implementing a trait if its inner type is erroneous)
 - rust-lang#105182 (Rustdoc-Json: Don't inline foreign traits)
 - rust-lang#105188 (Don't elide type information when printing E0308 with `-Zverbose`)
 - rust-lang#105189 (rustdoc: clean up redundant CSS on `.rustdoc-toggle.hideme`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 019795b into rust-lang:master Dec 3, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.67.0 milestone Dec 3, 2022
@jhpratt jhpratt deleted the fix-docs branch December 15, 2022 07:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs Area: Documentation for any part of the project, including the compiler, standard library, and tools S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants