Skip to content

Tracking issue for x86 bittest intrinsics #59414

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
gnzlbg opened this issue Mar 25, 2019 · 4 comments · Fixed by #86233
Closed

Tracking issue for x86 bittest intrinsics #59414

gnzlbg opened this issue Mar 25, 2019 · 4 comments · Fixed by #86233
Labels
B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. Libs-Tracked Libs issues that are tracked on the team's project board. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@gnzlbg
Copy link
Contributor

gnzlbg commented Mar 25, 2019

This is a tracking issue for the simd_x86_bittest feature gate, tracking the stabilization of the bittest Intel intrinsics - see rust-lang/stdarch#703 .
@gnzlbg gnzlbg mentioned this issue Mar 25, 2019
Merged
@sfackler sfackler added T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC labels Mar 25, 2019
@Centril Centril added the T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Mar 26, 2019
@KodrAus KodrAus added the Libs-Tracked Libs issues that are tracked on the team's project board. label Jul 31, 2020
@joshtriplett
Copy link
Member

I think it'd be reasonable to stabilize these at this point.

@rfcbot merge

@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Mar 31, 2021 •
edited by m-ou-se
Loading

Team member @joshtriplett has proposed to merge this. The next step is review by the rest of the tagged team members:

No concerns currently listed.

Once a majority of reviewers approve (and at most 2 approvals are outstanding), this will enter its final comment period. If you spot a major issue that hasn't been raised at any point in this process, please speak up!

See this document for info about what commands tagged team members can give me.

@rfcbot rfcbot added proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. labels Mar 31, 2021
@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Apr 14, 2021

🔔 This is now entering its final comment period, as per the review above. 🔔

@rfcbot rfcbot added final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. and removed proposed-final-comment-period Proposed to merge/close by relevant subteam, see T-<team> label. Will enter FCP once signed off. labels Apr 14, 2021
@rfcbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rfcbot commented Apr 24, 2021

The final comment period, with a disposition to merge, as per the review above, is now complete.

As the automated representative of the governance process, I would like to thank the author for their work and everyone else who contributed.

The RFC will be merged soon.

@rfcbot rfcbot added finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting and removed final-comment-period In the final comment period and will be merged soon unless new substantive objections are raised. labels Apr 24, 2021
@apiraino apiraino removed the to-announce Announce this issue on triage meeting label Apr 29, 2021
This was referenced Jun 10, 2021
Merged
Merged
@bors bors closed this as completed in a75e74d Jun 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
B-unstable Blocker: Implemented in the nightly compiler and unstable. C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC disposition-merge This issue / PR is in PFCP or FCP with a disposition to merge it. finished-final-comment-period The final comment period is finished for this PR / Issue. Libs-Tracked Libs issues that are tracked on the team's project board. T-lang Relevant to the language team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs-api Relevant to the library API team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Stabilize simd_x86_bittest feature JohnTitor/rust
7 participants
@joshtriplett @Centril @gnzlbg @sfackler @apiraino @KodrAus @rfcbot