Skip to content

Regression in test suite of probor-0.2.1 in Rust 1.15 #38715

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
brson opened this issue Dec 30, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

Regression in test suite of probor-0.2.1 in Rust 1.15 #38715

brson opened this issue Dec 30, 2016 · 1 comment
Assignees
@jseyfried
Labels
A-macros Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..) regression-from-stable-to-beta Performance or correctness regression from stable to beta. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Comments

@brson
Copy link
Contributor

brson commented Dec 30, 2016

https://github.com/tailhook/probor at d0be60ec37ded2eee0f851887e2d7c06fe2e7021

101 brian@ip-10-145-43-250:~/dev/probor/rust⟫ rustc +beta -Vv
rustc 1.15.0-beta.1 (d9a0f0df7 2016-12-19)
binary: rustc
commit-hash: d9a0f0df7051c603011d6b60fbdd155318fc47f3
commit-date: 2016-12-19
host: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
release: 1.15.0-beta.1
LLVM version: 3.9

brian@ip-10-145-43-250:~/dev/probor/rust⟫ cargo +beta test
   Compiling byteorder v1.0.0
   Compiling libc v0.2.18
   Compiling byteorder v0.5.3
   Compiling cbor-codec v0.5.0
   Compiling probor v0.2.1 (file:///mnt2/dev/probor/rust)
error[E0428]: a macro named `_probor_pattern` has already been defined in this module

error: aborting due to previous error

Build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
error: Could not compile `probor`.

cc @jseyfried I haven't seen one quite like this.

cc @tailhook
@brson brson added A-macros Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..) regression-from-stable-to-beta Performance or correctness regression from stable to beta. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 30, 2016
@jseyfried jseyfried self-assigned this Dec 30, 2016
@jseyfried jseyfried mentioned this issue Jan 3, 2017
Merged
@jseyfried
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed in #38793.

bors added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 5, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of #38793 - jseyfried:fix_macro_export_duplicates, r=nrc
131d5ce 
Fix regression with duplicate `#[macro_export] macro_rules!`

Fixes #38715.
r? @nrc
bors added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 6, 2017
@bors
Auto merge of #38793 - jseyfried:fix_macro_export_duplicates, r=nrc
e7907a9 
Fix regression with duplicate `#[macro_export] macro_rules!`

Fixes #38715.
r? @nrc
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@jseyfried jseyfried

Labels
A-macros Area: All kinds of macros (custom derive, macro_rules!, proc macros, ..) regression-from-stable-to-beta Performance or correctness regression from stable to beta. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@brson @jseyfried