Skip to content

Fix redundant_pattern_match on matches! macro #10831

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2023
Merged

Conversation

disco07
Copy link
Contributor

@disco07 disco07 commented May 26, 2023

This PR solve this issue #10803
r? @flip1995

changelog: none

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties label May 26, 2023
Copy link
Member

@flip1995 flip1995 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That was quick! One small comment.

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Can you squash your commits together? After that this can already be merged.

@disco07
Copy link
Contributor Author

disco07 commented May 26, 2023

Thanks! Can you squash your commits together? After that this can already be merged.

I think it's good now ;)

@flip1995
Copy link
Member

I rebased the branch on top of master and squashed the commits. (We don't want to have merge commits in the history).

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 26, 2023

📌 Commit 0b507c6 has been approved by flip1995

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 26, 2023

⌛ Testing commit 0b507c6 with merge 2422594...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented May 26, 2023

☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test
Approved by: flip1995
Pushing 2422594 to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants