Skip to content

Test for #3419 #3426

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 26, 2016
Merged

Test for #3419 #3426

merged 3 commits into from
Dec 26, 2016

Conversation

nrc
Copy link
Member

@nrc nrc commented Dec 18, 2016

Based on top of #3425.

I'm not sure if this is an acceptable test because it downloads rustc-serialize.

r? @alexcrichton

@nrc nrc changed the title Check fix 2 Test for #3419 Dec 19, 2016
authors = []

[dependencies]
rustc-serialize = "*"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah yeah we probably want to avoid downloading rustc-serialize here. If you look around in the test suite for Package::new though you'll see a way to shim the registry with a local copy and quickly create something locally.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also out of curiosity, what was the bug here? Did fixing the profiles fix it? If so that seems odd...

Unless we picked up the in-tree copy of rustc-serialize... oh dear...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not really sure.

@nrc
Copy link
Member Author

nrc commented Dec 21, 2016

Now with offline test

nrc added 2 commits December 22, 2016 09:44
Includes adding facility for checking that output does not contain a string.
@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

@bors: r+

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2016

📌 Commit 129ce53 has been approved by alexcrichton

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 129ce53 with merge 8babe9c...

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2016

💔 Test failed - status-appveyor

@alexcrichton
Copy link
Member

alexcrichton commented Dec 26, 2016 via email

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2016

⌛ Testing commit 129ce53 with merge 836c22d...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 26, 2016
Test for #3419

Based on top of #3425.

I'm not sure if this is an acceptable test because it downloads rustc-serialize.

r? @alexcrichton
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Dec 26, 2016

☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis
Approved by: alexcrichton
Pushing 836c22d to master...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants