Fix tests for Python 3.11 #7167
Conversation
|
Note, this is my first time touching pylint so please review carefully! There is still a problem with the |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2666572139
💛 - Coveralls |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
tests/functional/a/access/access_attr_before_def_false_positive.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Pierre-Sassoulas
added
Maintenance
|
I've re-factored the review changes into the original commits, and added a couple more fixes, including one for the syntax-error problem. In #6551 @DanielNoord suggested moving that test into the unit tests, but this just seems easier, at least until they change the description of this syntax error too... |
|
The CI failures look to be problems in the CI infra, not in the PR. |
|
@AdamWill Would you be willing to split out the |
|
@DanielNoord sure, I'll do that in a bit. |
This is because telnetlib is deprecated in Python 3.11. It's hard to see exactly what this is testing - there's no great explanation in-line and the test predates the first commit to the git repo so we don't have a commit message to help. telnetlib will be removed in 3.13, though, so at that point we'll have to figure it out or drop the telnetlib part of the test. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <[email protected]>
iterable_context_py3 includes some checks that we don't emit errors for asyncio.coroutine, but asyncio.coroutine has been removed in Python 3.11, so we need to set a max version of 3.10 for these tests. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <[email protected]>
The `binhex` module and `binascii.b2a_hqx()` function, which were deprecated in 3.9, are removed entirely in 3.11. Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <[email protected]>
Python 3.11 changes the string representation of the
SyntaxError triggered by this test - it now says "expected '('"
instead of just "invalid syntax". This changes the test to use
a different error (incomplete `for` loop) which still has just
"invalid syntax" as its description in Python 3.11. This is the
same 'bad code' used in the similar `test_stdin_syntaxerror` in
the unit tests.
Signed-off-by: Adam Williamson <[email protected]>
|
@DanielNoord done, can you clear the 'change requested'? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Made a mistake in my previous comment... 😅
Thanks @AdamWill
AdamWill
changed the title
super-init-not-called for Enum subclassessuper-init-not-called for Enum subclasses~~
AdamWill
changed the title
super-init-not-called for Enum subclasses~~
Type of Changes
Description
This fixes some issues in the tests with Python 3.11, and makes one change to the actual checks that is exposed by Python 3.11 - not emitting
super-init-not-calledfor subclasses ofEnum.Enumhas a__init__in Python 3.11, but it does nothing at all (justpass), and the examples in Python's ownEnumdocs include sample subclasses with their own__init__which do not callEnum.__init__, so clearly it's OK/intended for you to do that. I've asked upstream why this uselessEnum.__init__was added at all.