Skip to content

Suggest resources #343

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2022
Merged

Suggest resources #343

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2022

Conversation

toraritte
Copy link
Contributor

Replaced the "PureScript and NixOS" post with easy-purescript-nix as the former post is outdated (2015) and the latter is a widely accepted tool that can be used out of the box.

Thank you for considering!

- [PSCi](guides/PSCi.md): An interactive development tool for PureScript

### Ecosystem

- [Maintained Packages](ecosystem/Maintained-Packages.md)
- [Style Guide](guides/Style-Guide.md)
- [Alternate Backends](https://github.com/purescript/documentation/blob/master/ecosystem/Alternate-backends.md): PureScript can compile to other languages as well!
- [Recommended tooling for PureScript in 2020](https://discourse.purescript.org/t/recommended-tooling-for-purescript-in-2020/1615)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's an attempt to do this for the 2019 thread in #274. Some of the considerations discussed there also apply to this PR. I'm personally in favor of linking to that thread, or even tracking its contents in this repo so it can more easily be continuously updated.

Copy link
Member

@thomashoneyman thomashoneyman Aug 21, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this and the above reference to easy-purescript-nix can be removed once #347 is merged, as they will both be included in the "Editor and tool support" documentation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants