-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
Fixed apply_index #35165
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fixed apply_index #35165
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2c4c822
Fixed apply_index
TomAugspurger bf37664
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 34580-apply_index
TomAugspurger aba0a9c
fixup
TomAugspurger 7c91100
fixup
TomAugspurger fb1c46d
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 34580-apply_index
TomAugspurger c84bf14
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 34580-apply_index
TomAugspurger 4c49e5c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 34580-apply_index
TomAugspurger b44feb1
clean
TomAugspurger d27af58
doc ref
TomAugspurger 46b5b84
fixup
TomAugspurger 921b1bd
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 34580-apply_index
TomAugspurger 0189b9b
fixups
TomAugspurger File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we need to add these back if we are deprecating?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't know why, but sphinx started complaining about these not being present. Which is technically correct, since it's a method on those classes. It just raises.
So I think keep for now, and just remove them all when we enforce the deprecation in 2.0