Skip to content

concat handles MultiIndex differently when index is the same #20565

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
jkom329 opened this issue Mar 31, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

concat handles MultiIndex differently when index is the same #20565

jkom329 opened this issue Mar 31, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Bug MultiIndex Reshaping Concat, Merge/Join, Stack/Unstack, Explode

Comments

@jkom329
Copy link

jkom329 commented Mar 31, 2018

Code Sample, a copy-pastable example if possible

rows1 = 3
df1 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(rows1, 2), columns=['A', 'B'], index=['Z1']*rows1)

rows2 = 3
df2 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.randn(rows2, 2), columns=['A', 'B'], index=['Z1']*rows2)

df = pd.concat([df1, df2], keys=['Key1', 'Key2'], names=['KEY', 'ID'])
print(df.index)

Problem description

If rows1 = rows2 as in the example, I get the following multi index from concat where 'Z1' is repeated with separate references in labels. However, if rows1 != rows2 (e.g. change rows1 to 4), I get what seems to be the more reasonable result in the expected output where 'Z1' is listed once with the same reference in labels. Also, if I add the multi index before concat and just do concat([df1, df2]), I get the expected result.

MultiIndex(levels=[['Key1', 'Key2'], ['Z1', 'Z1', 'Z1']],
labels=[[0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 2]],
names=['KEY', 'ID'])

The repeating multi index seemed to cause issues later when using inner merge on left/right index. Is this concat behavior expected?

Expected Output

MultiIndex(levels=[['Key1', 'Key2'], ['Z1']],
labels=[[0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]],
names=['KEY', 'ID'])

Output of pd.show_versions()

[paste the output of pd.show_versions() here below this line]
INSTALLED VERSIONS

commit: None
python: 3.6.1.final.0
python-bits: 64
OS: Windows
OS-release: 10
machine: AMD64
processor: Intel64 Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3, GenuineIntel
byteorder: little
LC_ALL: None
LANG: None
LOCALE: None.None

pandas: 0.22.0
pytest: 3.0.7
pip: 9.0.1
setuptools: 27.2.0
Cython: 0.25.2
numpy: 1.12.1
scipy: 1.0.1
pyarrow: None
xarray: None
IPython: 5.3.0
sphinx: 1.5.6
patsy: 0.4.1
dateutil: 2.6.0
pytz: 2017.2
blosc: None
bottleneck: 1.2.1
tables: 3.4.2
numexpr: 2.6.4
feather: None
matplotlib: 2.0.2
openpyxl: 2.4.7
xlrd: 1.0.0
xlwt: 1.2.0
xlsxwriter: 0.9.6
lxml: 3.7.3
bs4: 4.6.0
html5lib: 0.999
sqlalchemy: 1.2.5
pymysql: None
psycopg2: None
jinja2: 2.9.6
s3fs: None
fastparquet: None
pandas_gbq: None
pandas_datareader: None

@jkom329 jkom329 changed the title concat handles MultiIndex differently when row count is the same concat handles MultiIndex differently when index is the same Mar 31, 2018
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Apr 1, 2018

hmm this is curious. @toobaz if you can have a look

@jreback jreback added Bug Reshaping Concat, Merge/Join, Stack/Unstack, Explode MultiIndex Difficulty Intermediate labels Apr 1, 2018
@jreback jreback added this to the Next Major Release milestone Apr 1, 2018
toobaz added a commit to toobaz/pandas that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2019
toobaz added a commit to toobaz/pandas that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2019
toobaz added a commit to toobaz/pandas that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2019
toobaz added a commit to toobaz/pandas that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2019
@mroeschke mroeschke removed this from the Contributions Welcome milestone Oct 13, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug MultiIndex Reshaping Concat, Merge/Join, Stack/Unstack, Explode
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants