-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.5k
concat handles MultiIndex differently when index is the same #20565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Comments
hmm this is curious. @toobaz if you can have a look |
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Code Sample, a copy-pastable example if possible
Problem description
If rows1 = rows2 as in the example, I get the following multi index from concat where 'Z1' is repeated with separate references in labels. However, if rows1 != rows2 (e.g. change rows1 to 4), I get what seems to be the more reasonable result in the expected output where 'Z1' is listed once with the same reference in labels. Also, if I add the multi index before concat and just do concat([df1, df2]), I get the expected result.
MultiIndex(levels=[['Key1', 'Key2'], ['Z1', 'Z1', 'Z1']],
labels=[[0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1], [0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 2]],
names=['KEY', 'ID'])
The repeating multi index seemed to cause issues later when using inner merge on left/right index. Is this concat behavior expected?
Expected Output
MultiIndex(levels=[['Key1', 'Key2'], ['Z1']],
labels=[[0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1], [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]],
names=['KEY', 'ID'])
Output of
pd.show_versions()
[paste the output of
pd.show_versions()
here below this line]INSTALLED VERSIONS
commit: None
python: 3.6.1.final.0
python-bits: 64
OS: Windows
OS-release: 10
machine: AMD64
processor: Intel64 Family 6 Model 94 Stepping 3, GenuineIntel
byteorder: little
LC_ALL: None
LANG: None
LOCALE: None.None
pandas: 0.22.0
pytest: 3.0.7
pip: 9.0.1
setuptools: 27.2.0
Cython: 0.25.2
numpy: 1.12.1
scipy: 1.0.1
pyarrow: None
xarray: None
IPython: 5.3.0
sphinx: 1.5.6
patsy: 0.4.1
dateutil: 2.6.0
pytz: 2017.2
blosc: None
bottleneck: 1.2.1
tables: 3.4.2
numexpr: 2.6.4
feather: None
matplotlib: 2.0.2
openpyxl: 2.4.7
xlrd: 1.0.0
xlwt: 1.2.0
xlsxwriter: 0.9.6
lxml: 3.7.3
bs4: 4.6.0
html5lib: 0.999
sqlalchemy: 1.2.5
pymysql: None
psycopg2: None
jinja2: 2.9.6
s3fs: None
fastparquet: None
pandas_gbq: None
pandas_datareader: None
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: