This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
OMF community should be for open science #90
Labels
OMF discussion
an issue to be raised for community discussion
standards - accessibility
Suggestions for accessibility standards
A general consensus is that the OMF should be a community that is dedicated to open, transparent modeling--even while recognizing that there are commercial and other actors who might not want to be open for various reasons. If the OMF becomes large enough, it might also help shift the perception of black box versus transparent modeling
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: