Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

OMF community should be for open science #90

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
cmbarton opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

OMF community should be for open science #90

cmbarton opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
OMF discussion an issue to be raised for community discussion standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards

Comments

@cmbarton
Copy link
Contributor

A general consensus is that the OMF should be a community that is dedicated to open, transparent modeling--even while recognizing that there are commercial and other actors who might not want to be open for various reasons. If the OMF becomes large enough, it might also help shift the perception of black box versus transparent modeling

@cmbarton cmbarton added the standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards label May 18, 2020
@alee alee added the OMF discussion an issue to be raised for community discussion label May 19, 2020
@alee alee closed this as completed May 28, 2021
@openmodelingfoundation openmodelingfoundation locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 28, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
OMF discussion an issue to be raised for community discussion standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants