Skip to content

Only selectors on JMSCorrelationID are currently supported #46

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
thejams opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Only selectors on JMSCorrelationID are currently supported #46

thejams opened this issue Feb 3, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@thejams
Copy link

thejams commented Feb 3, 2022

is there any posibility to sopport the JMSMessageID selector ? or is there a way to consume a specific message using the message id ?

@matrober-uk
Copy link
Member

Hi @thejams - it shouldn't be too hard to add support for JMSMessageID selector. Let me look at that over the next week and I'll post back here with an update.

@thejams
Copy link
Author

thejams commented Feb 3, 2022

Hi @matrober-uk great dude !! thank you very much it would be really great

matrober-uk added a commit to matrober-uk/mq-golang-jms20 that referenced this issue Feb 3, 2022
@matrober-uk
Copy link
Member

Hi @thejams - I've attached a commit in a personal branch that implements the basic behaviour;
https://github.com/matrober-uk/mq-golang-jms20/tree/getbymsgid

You're welcome to pull that update to try it out locally, and I'll add some additional tests in the near future before merging to main.

@chughts
Copy link

chughts commented Feb 4, 2022

matrober-uk added a commit to matrober-uk/mq-golang-jms20 that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2022
matrober-uk added a commit to matrober-uk/mq-golang-jms20 that referenced this issue Feb 5, 2022
@matrober-uk
Copy link
Member

Support for get by JMSMessageID merged under #47

thanks!

@matrober-uk
Copy link
Member

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants