Skip to content

docs: type generation for graphql servers #4376

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: 16.x.x
Choose a base branch
from
Open

docs: type generation for graphql servers #4376

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

sarahxsanders
Copy link
Contributor

Adds new guide: Type Generation for GraphQL Servers

This is a part of the effort to expand GraphQL.js documentation

@sarahxsanders sarahxsanders requested a review from a team as a code owner April 22, 2025 23:19
@sarahxsanders sarahxsanders changed the title docs: add guide for graphQL server type generation docs: type generation for graphql servers Apr 22, 2025
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Hi @sarahxsanders, I'm @github-actions bot happy to help you with this PR 👋

Supported commands

Please post this commands in separate comments and only one per comment:

  • @github-actions run-benchmark - Run benchmark comparing base and merge commits for this PR
  • @github-actions publish-pr-on-npm - Build package from this PR and publish it on NPM

eddeee888
eddeee888 reviewed Apr 24, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@eddeee888 eddeee888 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @sarahxsanders !
I'm from the GraphQL Codegen team at The Guild. I've left some minor comments about our recommendation when using Codegen. Keen to hear your thoughts!

@JoviDeCroock
Copy link
Member

I've fixed CI after rebasing this branch it will work again, apologies for the issues

@sarahxsanders sarahxsanders requested a review from eddeee888 April 26, 2025 20:06
@eddeee888
Copy link

Hi @sarahxsanders , thanks for making the changes to recommend presets.
Since preset config and benefits are very different from the base plugins, I wonder if there's a chance I could write those sections? Happy to provide direction too, but it's going to be very different from what we currently have 🙂

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eddeee888 eddeee888 Awaiting requested review from eddeee888

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@sarahxsanders @JoviDeCroock @eddeee888