Skip to content

rn20: expand a but about Dscho's work on interactive rebase #193

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 19, 2016

Conversation

jnareb
Copy link
Member

@jnareb jnareb commented Oct 18, 2016

Add an information from Dscho about the use of Scientist library to ensure that the patches making interactive rebase faster are in fact correct.

I'm not sure if the new information is well connected to the rest of it; as it is now, this point has actually two endings...

Add an information from Dscho about the use of Scientist
library to ensure that the patches making interactive rebase
faster are in fact correct.

I'm not sure if the new information is well connected to
the rest of it; as it is now, this point has actually two
endings...
@jnareb jnareb changed the title Reviews: expand a but about interactive rebase work rn20: expand a but about Dscho's work on interactive rebase Oct 18, 2016
@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

@jnareb I think this could go into a short separate article just below the existing one on rebase -i.
Are you ok to change it into an article?

@jnareb
Copy link
Member Author

jnareb commented Oct 19, 2016

@chriscool I don't mind changing it into a (short) article.

This would solve the problem of two endings ;-)

@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

Ok I will do that then.

@chriscool chriscool merged commit b23b6dd into git:master Oct 19, 2016
@chriscool
Copy link
Collaborator

See 23f9abe

@jnareb jnareb deleted the rn20-sequencer-more branch October 19, 2016 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants