Skip to content

distsql: better trace events for joinreader #40212

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2019

Conversation

RaduBerinde
Copy link
Member

Adding a few trace events per joinreader batch that were helpful to
debug an issue.

Release note: None

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@RaduBerinde
Copy link
Member Author

Ping.. this should take 2 minutes to review.

Adding a few trace events per joinreader batch that were helpful to
debug an issue.

Release note: None
@RaduBerinde RaduBerinde force-pushed the better-tracing-joinreader branch from a93e77d to 3d1c34f Compare September 3, 2019 15:47
Copy link
Member

@yuzefovich yuzefovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @solongordon)

@RaduBerinde
Copy link
Member Author

bors r+

craig bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2019
40212: distsql: better trace events for joinreader r=RaduBerinde a=RaduBerinde

Adding a few trace events per joinreader batch that were helpful to
debug an issue.

Release note: None

Co-authored-by: Radu Berinde <[email protected]>
@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 4, 2019

Build succeeded

@craig craig bot merged commit 3d1c34f into cockroachdb:master Sep 4, 2019
@RaduBerinde RaduBerinde deleted the better-tracing-joinreader branch September 11, 2019 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants