Skip to content

ObserveOn fix for observing the same source on the same scheduler by two... #572

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 8, 2013
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
97 changes: 45 additions & 52 deletions rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/operators/OperationObserveOn.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
import rx.concurrency.CurrentThreadScheduler;
import rx.concurrency.ImmediateScheduler;
import rx.subscriptions.CompositeSubscription;
import rx.subscriptions.SerialSubscription;
import rx.subscriptions.Subscriptions;
import rx.util.functions.Action0;
import rx.util.functions.Action1;
Expand All @@ -46,10 +47,6 @@ public static <T> OnSubscribeFunc<T> observeOn(Observable<? extends T> source, S
private static class ObserveOn<T> implements OnSubscribeFunc<T> {
private final Observable<? extends T> source;
private final Scheduler scheduler;
private volatile Scheduler recursiveScheduler;

final ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Notification<? extends T>> queue = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Notification<? extends T>>();
final AtomicInteger counter = new AtomicInteger(0);

public ObserveOn(Observable<? extends T> source, Scheduler scheduler) {
this.source = source;
Expand All @@ -65,71 +62,67 @@ public Subscription onSubscribe(final Observer<? super T> observer) {
// do nothing if we request CurrentThreadScheduler so we don't invoke overhead
return source.subscribe(observer);
} else {
return observeOn(observer, scheduler);
return new Observation(observer).init();
}
}
/** Observe through individual queue per observer. */
private class Observation implements Action1<Notification<? extends T>> {
final Observer<? super T> observer;
final CompositeSubscription s;
final ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Notification<? extends T>> queue;
final AtomicInteger counter;
private volatile Scheduler recursiveScheduler;
public Observation(Observer<? super T> observer) {
this.observer = observer;
this.queue = new ConcurrentLinkedQueue<Notification<? extends T>>();
this.counter = new AtomicInteger(0);
this.s = new CompositeSubscription();
}
public Subscription init() {
s.add(source.materialize().subscribe(this));
return s;
}

public Subscription observeOn(final Observer<? super T> observer, final Scheduler scheduler) {
final CompositeSubscription s = new CompositeSubscription();

s.add(source.materialize().subscribe(new Action1<Notification<? extends T>>() {

@Override
public void call(Notification<? extends T> e) {
// this must happen before 'counter' is used to provide synchronization between threads
queue.offer(e);

// we now use counter to atomically determine if we need to start processing or not
// it will be 0 if it's the first notification or the scheduler has finished processing work
// and we need to start doing it again
if (counter.getAndIncrement() == 0) {
if (recursiveScheduler == null) {
s.add(scheduler.schedule(null, new Func2<Scheduler, T, Subscription>() {

@Override
public void call(Notification<? extends T> e) {
queue.offer(e);
if (counter.getAndIncrement() == 0) {
if (recursiveScheduler == null) {
s.add(scheduler.schedule(null, new Func2<Scheduler, T, Subscription>() {
@Override
public Subscription call(Scheduler innerScheduler, T state) {
// record innerScheduler so 'processQueue' can use it for all subsequent executions
recursiveScheduler = innerScheduler;

processQueue(s, observer);
processQueue();

return Subscriptions.empty();
}
}));
} else {
processQueue(s, observer);
}
} else {
processQueue();
}

}
}));

return s;
}

/**
* This uses 'recursiveScheduler' NOT 'scheduler' as it should reuse the same scheduler each time it processes.
* This means it must first get the recursiveScheduler when it first executes.
*/
private void processQueue(final CompositeSubscription s, final Observer<? super T> observer) {
}
void processQueue() {
s.add(recursiveScheduler.schedule(new Action1<Action0>() {
@Override
public void call(Action0 self) {
Notification<? extends T> not = queue.poll();
if (not != null) {
not.accept(observer);
}

s.add(recursiveScheduler.schedule(new Action1<Action0>() {
@Override
public void call(Action0 self) {
Notification<? extends T> not = queue.poll();
if (not != null) {
not.accept(observer);
}
// decrement count and if we still have work to do
// recursively schedule ourselves to process again
if (counter.decrementAndGet() > 0) {
self.call();
}

// decrement count and if we still have work to do
// recursively schedule ourselves to process again
if (counter.decrementAndGet() > 0) {
self.call();
}

}
}));
}));
}
}
}

}
}
74 changes: 74 additions & 0 deletions rxjava-core/src/test/java/rx/operators/OperationObserveOnTest.java
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
import rx.Observable;
import rx.Observer;
import rx.concurrency.Schedulers;
import rx.concurrency.TestScheduler;
import rx.util.functions.Action1;

public class OperationObserveOnTest {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -132,4 +133,77 @@ public void call(String t1) {

inOrder.verify(observer, times(1)).onCompleted();
}
@Test
public void observeOnTheSameSchedulerTwice() {
TestScheduler scheduler = new TestScheduler();

Observable<Integer> o = Observable.from(1, 2, 3);
Observable<Integer> o2 = o.observeOn(scheduler);

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Observer<Object> observer1 = mock(Observer.class);
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Observer<Object> observer2 = mock(Observer.class);

InOrder inOrder1 = inOrder(observer1);
InOrder inOrder2 = inOrder(observer2);

o2.subscribe(observer1);
o2.subscribe(observer2);

scheduler.advanceTimeBy(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

inOrder1.verify(observer1, times(1)).onNext(1);
inOrder1.verify(observer1, times(1)).onNext(2);
inOrder1.verify(observer1, times(1)).onNext(3);
inOrder1.verify(observer1, times(1)).onCompleted();
verify(observer1, never()).onError(any(Throwable.class));
inOrder1.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

inOrder2.verify(observer2, times(1)).onNext(1);
inOrder2.verify(observer2, times(1)).onNext(2);
inOrder2.verify(observer2, times(1)).onNext(3);
inOrder2.verify(observer2, times(1)).onCompleted();
verify(observer2, never()).onError(any(Throwable.class));
inOrder2.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

}
@Test
public void observeSameOnMultipleSchedulers() {
TestScheduler scheduler1 = new TestScheduler();
TestScheduler scheduler2 = new TestScheduler();

Observable<Integer> o = Observable.from(1, 2, 3);
Observable<Integer> o1 = o.observeOn(scheduler1);
Observable<Integer> o2 = o.observeOn(scheduler2);

@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Observer<Object> observer1 = mock(Observer.class);
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
Observer<Object> observer2 = mock(Observer.class);

InOrder inOrder1 = inOrder(observer1);
InOrder inOrder2 = inOrder(observer2);

o1.subscribe(observer1);
o2.subscribe(observer2);

scheduler1.advanceTimeBy(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
scheduler2.advanceTimeBy(1, TimeUnit.SECONDS);

inOrder1.verify(observer1, times(1)).onNext(1);
inOrder1.verify(observer1, times(1)).onNext(2);
inOrder1.verify(observer1, times(1)).onNext(3);
inOrder1.verify(observer1, times(1)).onCompleted();
verify(observer1, never()).onError(any(Throwable.class));
inOrder1.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

inOrder2.verify(observer2, times(1)).onNext(1);
inOrder2.verify(observer2, times(1)).onNext(2);
inOrder2.verify(observer2, times(1)).onNext(3);
inOrder2.verify(observer2, times(1)).onCompleted();
verify(observer2, never()).onError(any(Throwable.class));
inOrder2.verifyNoMoreInteractions();

}
}