Skip to content

Moving unit tests to test source folders #439 #465

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 5, 2013

Conversation

pasviegas
Copy link

No description provided.

@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

RxJava-pull-requests #385 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

That is an impressive amount of work @pasviegas and changes look mostly clean.

I have to say, this reminds me why I prefer not having tests separated...

Not thrilled with some of the privates being made package public, especially on ones where it breaks the singleton contract. I'm looking at those right now so I can try and merge without sacrificing those before anything else in the codebase changes and causes conflicts as this is a nasty thing to merge with conflicts.

@benjchristensen
Copy link
Member

I have merged these changes. Thank you!

jihoonson pushed a commit to jihoonson/RxJava that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2020
…nd d… (ReactiveX#465)

* Reactor and RxJava RateLimiter operator try to reserve a permission and delay the subscription if necessary.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants