Skip to content

Add multi-process support to --check. #2638

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

emmericp
Copy link
Contributor

Set the parameter --num_threads to the desired number of worker tasks to potentially speed up --check.

This works by spawning multiple sub-proccesses that each run the desired diagnostics on a subset of the workspace. Each process will still load and compile the entire workspace, so there are diminishing returns and memory usage increases linearly with the number of threads.

Overall this can reduce the runtime by about ~50% for my projects, example results:

Workspace 1, dominated by a few large/complex files

1 thread: 49.7 seconds
2 threads: 31.8 seconds
4 threads: 23.6 seconds
8 threads: 24.4 seconds

Workspace 2, large number of small-ish files

1 thread: 96.0 seconds
2 threads: 76.5 seconds
4 threads: 49.5 seconds
8 threads: 38.1 seconds

Set the parameter --num_threads to the desired number of worker tasks to
potentially speed up --check.

This works by spawning multiple sub-proccesses that each run the desired
diagnostics on a subset of the workspace. Each process will still load
and compile the entire workspace, so there are diminishing returns and
memory usage increases linearly with the number of threads.

Overall this can reduce the runtime by about ~50% for my projects,
example results:

Workspace 1, dominated by a few large/complex files

1 thread:  49.7 seconds
2 threads: 31.8 seconds
4 threads: 23.6 seconds
8 threads: 24.4 seconds

Workspace 2, large number of small-ish files

1 thread:  96.0 seconds
2 threads: 76.5 seconds
4 threads: 49.5 seconds
8 threads: 38.1 seconds
@sumneko sumneko merged commit d174050 into LuaLS:master May 9, 2024
8 of 9 checks passed
@sumneko
Copy link
Collaborator

sumneko commented May 9, 2024

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants