From 314277cb288c90913088bda69a174c1e262afbac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ms2ger <Ms2ger@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 14:52:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] [editorial] Replace 'let' with 'set' as appropriate

---
 spec.html | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/spec.html b/spec.html
index 905a851..932a0f3 100644
--- a/spec.html
+++ b/spec.html
@@ -164,10 +164,10 @@ <h1><ins>Array.fromAsync ( _asyncItems_ [ , _mapfn_ [ , _thisArg_ ] ] )</ins></h
               1. Repeat, while _k_ &lt; _len_,
                 1. Let _Pk_ be ! ToString(𝔽(_k_)).
                 1. Let _kValue_ be ? Get(_arrayLike_, _Pk_).
-                1. Let _kValue_ be ? Await(_kValue_).
+                1. Set _kValue_ to ? Await(_kValue_).
                 1. If _mapping_ is *true*, then
                   1. Let _mappedValue_ be ? Call(_mapfn_, _thisArg_, &laquo; _kValue_, 𝔽(_k_) &raquo;).
-                  1. Let _mappedValue_ be ? Await(_mappedValue_).
+                  1. Set _mappedValue_ to ? Await(_mappedValue_).
                 1. Else, let _mappedValue_ be _kValue_.
                 1. Perform ? CreateDataPropertyOrThrow(_A_, _Pk_, _mappedValue_).
                 1. Set _k_ to _k_ + 1.