You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
TarantoolBot opened this issue
Jan 13, 2023
· 0 comments
· Fixed by #3593
Assignees
Labels
2.112.11 release and the associated technical debtfeatureA new functionalityreference[location] Tarantool manual, Reference partserver[area] Task relates to Tarantool's server (core) functionality
Now it's allowed to pass transaction options in the first argument
of box.atomic(..) call. The options must be a table, exactly as
in box.begin(..). If options are passed as the first arguments,
the second and the rest arguments are expected to be a functions
and its arguments, like in usual box.atomic.
Requested by @alyapunov in tarantool/tarantool@9d1cbda.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
xuniq
added
server
[area] Task relates to Tarantool's server (core) functionality
reference
[location] Tarantool manual, Reference part
feature
A new functionality
labels
Jan 17, 2023
2.112.11 release and the associated technical debtfeatureA new functionalityreference[location] Tarantool manual, Reference partserver[area] Task relates to Tarantool's server (core) functionality
Product: Tarantool
Since: 2.11
Root document: https://www.tarantool.io/en/doc/latest/reference/reference_lua/box_txn_management/atomic/
SME: @ alyapunov
Details
Now it's allowed to pass transaction options in the first argument
of box.atomic(..) call. The options must be a table, exactly as
in box.begin(..). If options are passed as the first arguments,
the second and the rest arguments are expected to be a functions
and its arguments, like in usual box.atomic.
Requested by @alyapunov in tarantool/tarantool@9d1cbda.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: