Skip to content

Tracking: OIDC support #462

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Techassi opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Tracking: OIDC support #462

Techassi opened this issue Nov 16, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@Techassi
Copy link
Member

Techassi commented Nov 16, 2023

This issue tracks the implementation of OIDC support across the SDP.

### General Tasks
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/operator-rs/pull/680
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/documentation/pull/460
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/commons-operator/pull/186
### Create stack
- [ ] Set up stack using Keycloak with https and sample users + clients for every data product we use in the stacks + demos + client for userinfofetcher
- [ ] Deploy OPA with userinfofetcher
- [ ] Deploy Trino using OIDC
- [ ] Deploy Superset using OIDC
- [ ] Deploy Druid using OIDC
### Operator Tasks
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/kafka-operator/issues/630
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/opa-operator/pull/433
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/commons-operator/pull/187
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/trino-operator/pull/501
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/trino-operator/issues/473
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/superset-operator/issues/405
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/superset-operator/pull/423
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/airflow-operator/issues/337
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/nifi-operator/issues/633
- [ ] https://github.com/stackabletech/druid-operator/issues/473
@fhennig
Copy link
Contributor

fhennig commented Nov 20, 2023

I had this one before: #431 (for context)

@Techassi
Copy link
Member Author

Oh you are right. Let me merge some of the contents then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants