Skip to content

BLD: investigate / switch to using miniconda rather than whls #6870

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
jreback opened this issue Apr 11, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7971
Closed

BLD: investigate / switch to using miniconda rather than whls #6870

jreback opened this issue Apr 11, 2014 · 2 comments · Fixed by #7971
Labels
CI Continuous Integration
Milestone

Comments

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented Apr 11, 2014

we have a nice build system, though switching versions of sub-libraries requires rebuilding a whl (not that big a deal really).

that said, this is somewhat simpler as conda is pulling something like a whl which they are mainting, so switching versions of sub-libraries would be pretty easy.

statsmodels/statsmodels@36bd0c9

@jreback jreback added this to the 0.15.0 milestone Apr 11, 2014
@jreback jreback added the CI label Apr 11, 2014
@jreback jreback modified the milestones: 0.15.0, 0.15.1 Jul 9, 2014
@cpcloud cpcloud self-assigned this Aug 9, 2014
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Sep 30, 2014

@cpcloud ???????

@cpcloud
Copy link
Member

cpcloud commented Oct 1, 2014

Hey sorry I've been letting this slide. I'll finish this up this weekend.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CI Continuous Integration
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants