Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Suggestion to include wording around licensing #86

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
kettner opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Suggestion to include wording around licensing #86

kettner opened this issue May 18, 2020 · 1 comment
Assignees
@alee
Labels
standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards

Comments

@kettner
Copy link

kettner commented May 18, 2020

To @MarcoAJanssen & @cmbarton: maybe the Accessibility section should include wording around how 'open access' code is. In other words, what is the license for the code; how can people use the software.
@kettner kettner added the standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards label May 18, 2020
@jedbrown
Copy link

Cc: #88

@alee alee closed this as completed May 30, 2021
@openmodelingfoundation openmodelingfoundation locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 30, 2021

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Assignees

@alee alee

Labels
standards - accessibility Suggestions for accessibility standards
Projects
OMF Project Management
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@jedbrown @alee @kettner