Skip to content

Respect and requests #7

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
gandhiShepard opened this issue Sep 30, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

Respect and requests #7

gandhiShepard opened this issue Sep 30, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@gandhiShepard
Copy link

First (respect) : This is an awesome list. I've been referring to everything on this list for years. Thanks for organizing this on one place.

Second (request) : This is more of a conversation starter than a request, but what do you think about having a "Beta" section. This repo might not be the place for it, but I think that there is some value to looking into the experimental/arguable stuff. For example, I came across AMCSS Introducing AM - Attribute Modules for CSS. I think that it's has been proven to be less performant, but the buzz around determining it's scalability was awesome. AMCSS Performance Discussion

Here's another: DocCSSa

I agree with all of the resources you have listed whole heartedly. I'm also gleaning a lot of information looking into the controversial and beta stuff too.

I'm not trying to change things up, just wondering if a beta section would be a good idea.

Stay awesome!
Best regards,

Ben

@davidtheclark
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

I'm worried the "Beta" idea would be a rabbit hole and make the reading list too large. I still think there's plenty of arguable stuff and different opinions in the referenced articles ---- I'm not trying to display a consensus, really.

AMCSS, though, I don't think is about scalable CSS so much as cleaner HTML. I decided not to include it here: #3.

DocCSSa might fit in. But I'm wondering what it uniquely adds. What do you think?

@gandhiShepard
Copy link
Author

I'm not going to argue with the Rabbit Hole analogy. I agree with that assessment.

I know that AMCSS promoted itself to be scalable. However, it has proven to have slower performance. But then again, jQuery is less performant than vanilla JS. I just like the creative effort to find a way to make the task of writing CSS manageable. Performance and scaleability aside, I thought it was clever.

I'll leave it up to you about including DocCSSa. I think that it works for app development, but not so much for lower level stuff. It also requires some serious Sass skills. The whole deferred concept is pretty cool. I picked up some clever techniques from both of these approaches.

Here's a great read that kind weighs in on some of this stuff.

Thanks for the conversation and consideration. Have a great weekend.
Stay awesome!

@davidtheclark
Copy link
Owner

I'll have to read more of the DocCSSa stuff. I'm not sure I gleaned the deferred concept on a quick look.

I of course think that Role of Utility Classes... article is ok --- but I wrote it. Feel a little weird about putting my own article on here.

@gandhiShepard
Copy link
Author

Haha! That's so funny! I should have checked the author! Haha! Good lord. Regardless, it's a great article. I'm just gonna shut up now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants