Skip to content

Update translation #290

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
LlGC-szw opened this issue Apr 19, 2016 · 6 comments
Closed

Update translation #290

LlGC-szw opened this issue Apr 19, 2016 · 6 comments

Comments

@LlGC-szw
Copy link

Afternoon, is the transifex file the most up-to-date version? I'd like to update some of the terms in 1.7.11 but can't find them (eg volume). Let me know and I'll get the translations done by next week. Thanks.

@edsilv
Copy link
Member

edsilv commented Apr 19, 2016

It isn't... I'll look at updating it tomorrow

@LlGC-szw
Copy link
Author

Thanks Ed, there's no huge rush we're still testing manifests before releasing 1.7.

@edsilv
Copy link
Member

edsilv commented Apr 21, 2016

that's now done. here's a video guide for updating the source strings:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HDjLG2ro9VI

they've altered the UI slightly since then, but it's basically the same.

@edsilv edsilv closed this as completed Apr 21, 2016
@LlGC-dwj
Copy link

LlGC-dwj commented May 9, 2016

Hello,

Could you clarify how you want us to translate the UV? Sara has updated a few strings in Transifex, but what then is the next step? Do we need to contact you to ask for the UV strings to be updated or have you got a way that automatically updates the strings on Github? Do you want us to create a pull request? As hopefully now we've done all the translation for the time being, but we don't want to be hassling you with small changes!

Kind Regards,
Dylan

@edsilv
Copy link
Member

edsilv commented May 10, 2016

Hi,

There is a document here describing the update process:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SJm4G6twYTquLUb5nIE6gZbpzfQcvDTBFToq6a9P_-w/edit?usp=sharing

It's not terribly well organised at the moment and needs some more time spent on it, but hopefully it should tell you everything you need to do to update the l10n files in your fork of the UV.

We're looking at replacing Transifex:

#172

This would be quite a lot of work, but should ultimately be a much better set up.

@LlGC-dwj
Copy link

Thanks Ed, that answers my questions.

Regards,
Dylan

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants